Exemplis Discimus 2004, 148(2):145-152

Duis lorem mi, consectetuer vel, consectetuer nec, suscipit quis, augue.

Akysa Spince
Institute of Practical Hematology, Teaching Hospital of Quence, Republic of Ord Mandell

Sed quam purus, ultrices vel, adipiscing pretium, facilisis vitae, urna.. Aenean quis turpis a mauris fermentum vulputate. Vivamus neque diam, malesuada ut, pretium sed, hendrerit sed, lorem. Ut risus mi, commodo at, accumsan in, dignissim et, risus. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Nullam eros urna, ultricies sed, elementum vel, lobortis sit amet, sem. Aliquam eu odio auctor ligula eleifend viverra. Aenean vitae ante et metus ultrices lobortis.

Keywords: Aenean laoreet, Donec ante, Sed in arcu, Nunc sed sapien

Received: July 10, 2004; Accepted: September 4, 2004; Published: December 1, 2004 

Open full article

References

  1. Bradley DC, Garrett MF. (1983) Hemispheric differences in the recognition closed- and open- class words. Neuropsychologia 21, 155-159. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Brown CM, Hagoort P, Keurs M. (1999) Electrophysiological signatures of visual lexical processing: open- and closed-class words. J Cogn Neurosci 11, 261-281. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Caramazza A, Zurif EB. (1976) Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: evidence from aphasia. Brain Lang 3, 572-582. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Caramazza A, Hillis AE. (1991) Lexical organization of nouns and verbs in the brain. Nature 349, 788-790. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Fischler I, Bloom PA, Childers DG, Roucos SE, Perry NW. (1983) Brain potentials related to stages of sentence verification. Psychophysiology 20, 400-409. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Friederici AD. (1983) Aphasics perception of words in sentential context: Some real-time processing evidence. Neuropsychologia 21, 351-358. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Friederici AD. (1985) Levels of processing and vocabulary types: evidence from on-line comprehension in normals and agrammatics. Cognition 19, 133-166. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Fromkin VA. (1995) Introduction to special issue: Linguistic representational and processing analysis of agrammatism. Brain Lang 50, 1-9. Go to original source...
  9. Chiarello C, Nuding S. (1987) Visual field effects for processing content and function words. Neuropsychologia 25, 539-548. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Jasper HH. (1958) The ten twenty electrode system of the international federation. Electroencephalog Clin Neurophysiol 10, 371-375.
  11. Jelínek J, Bečka VJ, Těšitelová M. Frekvence slov, slovních druhů a tvarů v českém jazyce. Praha: SPN, 1961.
  12. Johnson Jr R. (1993) On the neural generators of the P300 component of the event-related potential. Psychophysiology 30, 90-97. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Kellenbach ML, Wijers AA, Hovius M, Mulder J, Mulder G. (2002) Neural differentiation of lexico-semantic categories or semantic features? Event-related potential evidence for both. J Cogn Neurosci 14, 561-577. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Kutas M, Hillyard SA. (1980) Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science 207, 203-205. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Kutas M, Hillyard SA. (1984) Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature 307, 161-163. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Mohr B, Pulvermüller F, Zaidel E. (1994) Lexical decision after left, right and bilateral presentation of words, function words and non-words: Evidence for interhemispheric interaction. Neuropsychologia 32, 105-124. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Neville HJ, Kutas M, Chesney G., Schmidt A. (1986) Event-related brain potentials during initial encoding and subsequent recognition memory of congruous and incongruous words. J Mem Lang 25, 75-92. Go to original source...
  18. Osterhout L, Bersick M, McKinnon R. (1997) Brain potentials elicited by words: word length and frequency predict the latency of an early negativity. Biol Psychol 46, 143-168. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Petřek J. (2004) Aktivita mozku při zpracování jazyka. Čs. Fyziol 53, 125-131.
  20. Pulvermüller F. (1999) Words in the brains language. Behav Brain Sci 22, 253-336. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Pulvermüller F. (2002) A brain perspective on language mechanisms: from discrete neuronal ensembles to serial order. Prog Neurobiol 67, 85-111. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Pulvermüller F, Lutzenberger W, Birbaumer N. (1995) Electrocortical distinction of vocabulary types. Electroencephalog Clin Neurophysiol 94, 357-370. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Roth Z, Josífko M, Malý V, Trčka V. Statistické metody v experimentální medicíně. Praha: SZdN, 1962.
  24. Stuss DT, Sarazin FF, Leech EE, Picton TW. (1983) Event related potentials during naming and mental rotation. Electroencephalog Clin Neurophysiol 56, 133-146. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

Return to the content