Exemplis Discimus 2006, 150(1):171-177

Curabitur est pede, mattis quis, posuere non, tincidunt id, mi.

WuFei Tulla, Myn Aadedaib, Katara Securac, Rodsu Stomad, Dralin Tilliskb, Marz Nerose, Ivand Aasae, Lambida Tobianf
a Laboratory of Social Medicine, Teaching Hospital of Hypori, Republic of Ord Mandell
b 1st Clinic of Clinical biology, Faculty Hospital of Bespin, Subterrel Republic
c Faculty of Audiology, Nar Shadda University Hospital, Malastare Republic
d Centre of Dermato-venerology, University Hospital of Castell, Bogden Republic
e Clinic of Periodontics, University Hospital of Mayagil, Polis Massa Republic
f 1st Clinic of Infectious diseases, Teaching Hospital of Vivenda, Republic of Saleucami

Background: Sed pede metus, imperdiet sed, accumsan ut, vehicula sit amet, velit. Curabitur eu augue vitae velit posuere tincidunt. Aliquam justo erat, varius nec, fermentum non, tincidunt eu, arcu.. Ut dui velit, sodales ut, tempor id, tincidunt id, lectus. Ut lectus metus, mattis ac, fermentum et, fermentum a, risus. Vivamus neque diam, malesuada ut, pretium sed, hendrerit sed, lorem. Donec vehicula nisi ut pede ultrices suscipit.. Vivamus orci enim, vestibulum sit amet, laoreet quis, ornare eget, magna.

Methods: Suspendisse quam leo, convallis a, tristique non, vulputate vel, ligula. Aliquam magna nunc, ullamcorper ac, adipiscing in, bibendum molestie, ante. Cras nisl ante, mattis in, placerat a, consectetuer ut, ligula. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Maecenas tortor massa, ultricies eget, rhoncus nec, blandit vitae, velit. Suspendisse id leo nec nunc pulvinar suscipit. Sed velit orci, suscipit in, luctus nec, laoreet eget, neque. Cras eget lacus vel ante adipiscing posuere..

Results: Praesent consequat, nulla sed fringilla cursus, leo purus porttitor risus, nec scelerisque nisi nisl ut tellus. Nam lacinia, nulla vel condimentum elementum, metus elit dignissim neque, in varius quam nibh non enim..

Conclusion: Aliquam at lacus et turpis vulputate rutrum. Curabitur ac lectus id magna ullamcorper faucibus. Nam ac tortor pretium risus dapibus pulvinar. Proin justo lacus, suscipit at, imperdiet a, sollicitudin vel, tellus. Nam pede leo, ornare ac, porta quis, dignissim sit amet, erat. Proin ut quam iaculis libero facilisis iaculis. Integer ante enim, tempor quis, pharetra vel, ultricies at, diam. Suspendisse sed mauris eu ipsum ornare vulputate.

Kµúčové slová: Sed sed eros, Aliquam metus, Cras at neque, Nunc feugiat, Aenean vel sapien

Vloľený: February 24, 2006; Přijatý: April 2, 2006; Uverejnené: July 1, 2006 

Zobrazi» celý článok

Referencie

  1. Danovitch GM. Handbook of kidney transplantation. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2005.
  2. United Network for organ Sharing (UNOS) data base. http://www. optn.org/AR.2004/chapter.AR.cd.htm
  3. Randhawa P. (2001) Role of donor kidney biopsies in renal transplantation. Transplantation 71, 13615. Prejs» k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejs» na PubMed...
  4. Oda A, Morozumi K, Uchida K. (1999) Histological factors of 1-h biopsy influencing the delayed renal function and outcome in cadaveric renal allografts. Clin Transplant 13, 612. Prejs» na PubMed...
  5. Pokorná E, Vítko ©, Chadimová M, Schuck O, Ekberg H. (2000) Proportion of glomerulosclerosis in procurement wedge renal biopsy cannot alone discriminate for acceptance of marginal donors. Transplantation 69, 3643. Prejs» k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejs» na PubMed...
  6. Lechevallier E, Dussol B, Luccioni A, Thirion X, Vacher-Copomat H, Jaber K, Brunet P, Leonetti F, Lavelle O, Coulange C, Berland Y. (1998) Posttransplantation acute tubular necrosis: risk factors and implications for graft survival. Am J Kidney Dis 32, 98491. Prejs» k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejs» na PubMed...
  7. Metzger RA, Delmonico FL, Feng S, Port FK, Wynn JJ, Merion RM. (2003) Expanded criteria donors for kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 3, 11425. Prejs» k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejs» na PubMed...
  8. Perico N, Cattaneo D, Sayegh MH, Remuzzi G. (2004) Delayed graft function in kidney transplantation. Lancet 364, 181427. Prejs» k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejs» na PubMed...
  9. Di Paolo S, Stallone G, Schena A, Infante B, Gesualdo L, Paolo Schena F. (2002) Hypertension is an independent predictor of delayed graft function and worse renal function only in kidney with chronic pathological lesions. Transplantation 73, 6237. Prejs» k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejs» na PubMed...
  10. Lu AD, Desai D, Myers BD, Dafoe DC, Alfrey EJ. (2000) Severe glomerular sclerosis is not associated with poor outcome after kidney transplantation. Am J Surg 180, 4704. Prejs» k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejs» na PubMed...
  11. Gaber LW, Moore LW, Alloway RR, Amiri MH, Vera SR, Gaber AO. (1995) Glomerulosclerosis as a determinant of posttransplant function of older donor renal allografts. Transplantation 60, 334 9. Prejs» k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejs» na PubMed...
  12. Escofet X, Osman H, Griffiths DF, Woydag S, Adam JW. (2003) The presence of glomerular sclerosis at time zero has a significant impact on function after cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplantation 75, 3446. Prejs» k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejs» na PubMed...
  13. Duman S, Ozbek S, Sen S, Tamsel S, Toz H, Asci G, Ozkahya M, Sezis M, Ok E, Hoscoskun C. (2004) Is zero-hour biopsy of the transplanted kidney risky? Transplant Proc 36, 1378. Prejs» k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejs» na PubMed...
  14. Randhawa PS, Minervini MI, Lombardero M, Duquesnoy R, Fung J, Shapiro R, Jordan M, Vivas C, Scantlebury V, Demetris A. (2000) Biopsy of marginal donor kidneys: correlation of histologic findings with graft dysfunction. Transplantation 69, 13527. Prejs» k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejs» na PubMed...
  15. Cosyns JP, Malaise J, Hanique G, Mourad M, Baldi A, Goebbels RM, Squifflet JP. (1998) Lesions in donor kidneys: nature, incidence, and influence on graft function. Transpl Int 11, 227. Prejs» k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejs» na PubMed...
  16. Papadimitriou JC, Coale R, Farney A, Schweitzer E, Foster C, Campos L, Bartlett S. (2004) Biopsy of the marginal kidney donor: correlation of histology with outcome. Transplant Proc 36, 7424. Prejs» k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejs» na PubMed...
  17. Pokorná E, Vítko ©, Chadimová M, Schuck O. (2001) Morphologic changes in renal procurement biopsy and onset of graft function. Transplant Proc 33, 19992000. Prejs» k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejs» na PubMed...
  18. Bosmans JL, Woestenburg AT, Helbert MJ, Ysebaert DK, Van Marck E, De Broe ME, Verpooten GA. (2000) Impact of donor-related vascular alterations in implantation biopsies on morphologic and functional outcome of cadaveric renal allografts. Transplant Proc 32, 37980. Prejs» k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejs» na PubMed...
  19. Bosmans JL, Woestenburg A, Ysebaert DK, Chapelle T, Helbert MJ, Corthouts R, Jurgens A, Van Daele A, Van Marck EA, De Broe ME, Verpooten GA. (2000) Fibrous intimal thickening at implantation as a risk factor for the outcome of cadaveric renal allografts. Transplantation 69, 238894. Prejs» k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejs» na PubMed...
  20. Szakaly P, Magyarlaki T, Kalmar NK. (2001) Clinical value of zero-hour biopsy in kidney transplantation. Magy Seb 54, 18 22.
  21. Pokorná E, Vítko ©, Chadimová M, Schuck O. (2000) Adverse effect of donor arteriosclerosis on graft outcome after renal transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 15, 70510. Prejs» k pôvodnému zdroju...
  22. Minakawa R, Tyden G, Lindholm B, Reinholt FP. (1996) Donor kidney vasculopathy: impact on outcome in kidney transplantation. Transpl Immunol 4, 30912. Prejs» k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejs» na PubMed...
  23. Karpinski J, Lajoie G, Cattran D, Fenton S, Zaltzman J, Cardella C, Cole E. (1999) Outcome of kidney transplantation from high-risk donors is determined by both structure and function. Transplantation 67, 11627. Prejs» k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejs» na PubMed...
  24. Wang HJ, Kjellstrand CM, Cockfield SM, Solez K. (1998) On the influence of sample size on the prognostic accuracy and reproducibility of renal transplant biopsy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 13, 16572. Prejs» k pôvodnému zdroju...
  25. Sugiyama S, Tsuyuki M, Okazaki Y, Takeuchi N, Matsuura O, Ohshima S. (1994) Arteriosclerotic lesions of donor kidney and graft survival. Transplant Proc 26, 92930. Prejs» na PubMed...
  26. Tracy RE, Strong JP, Newman WP 3rd, Malcolm GT, Oalmann MC, Guzman MA. (1996) Renovasculopathies of nephrosclerosis in relation to atherosclerosis at ages 25 to 54 years. Kidney Int 49, 56470. Prejs» k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejs» na PubMed...
  27. Viklický O, Bohmová R, Heemann UW. (2002) The kidney ageing and transplantation. Čas Lék Česk 141, 7658.
  28. Seron D, Carrera M, Grino JM. (1993) Relationship between donor renal interstitial surface and post-transplant function. Nephrol Dial Transplant 71, 53943.
  29. Isoniemi H, von Willebrand E, Krogerus L, Taskinen E, Ahonen J, Hayry P. (1992) The effect of donor age on kidney graft function and on histopathological findings. Transplant Proc 24, 3289.
  30. Kuypers DR, Chapman JR, O´Connell PJ, Allen RD, Nankivell BJ. (1999) Predictors of renal transplant histology at three months. Transplantation 67, 122230. Prejs» k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejs» na PubMed...
  31. Kaplan C, Pasternack B, Shah H, Gallo G. (1975) Age-related incidence of sclerotic glomeruli in human kidneys. Am J Pathol 80, 22734. Prejs» na PubMed...
  32. Goldstein RS, Tarloff JB, Hook JB (1988) Age-related nephropathy in laboratory rats. FASEB J 2, 224151.
  33. Oberhauer R, Rohermoser M, Regele H, Muhlbacher F, Mayer G. (1999) Apoptosis of tubular epithelial cells in donor kidney biopsies predicts renal allograft function. J Am Soc Nephrol 10, 200613.

Spä» na obsah