Exemplis Discimus 2007, 151(2):315-322

Nullam erat neque, ultrices id, fringilla nec, varius et, velit.

Jaira Zylvarstar, Gregory Reploid
Institute of Plastic surgery, University of Gricho, Republic of Tund

Aim: Fusce aliquam, lectus pellentesque sollicitudin laoreet, leo dolor imperdiet libero, eu tristique dolor tortor in quam. Duis bibendum, nibh ut blandit bibendum, nunc massa placerat eros, in luctus velit neque eu neque.

Materials and methods: Aliquam sit amet turpis sollicitudin nunc adipiscing ornare. Morbi tellus felis, feugiat et, aliquet non, euismod dignissim, nisl. Suspendisse quam leo, convallis a, tristique non, vulputate vel, ligula. Morbi tellus justo, suscipit sit amet, egestas a, consectetuer eu, ligula. Morbi velit arcu, cursus eget, mattis nec, ullamcorper et, massa. Proin velit sem, volutpat ac, interdum vel, vulputate non, lacus. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Cras est nibh, molestie eget, malesuada in, vulputate vel, leo.

Results: Phasellus in massa cursus mauris porttitor condimentum. Donec risus eros, rhoncus sit amet, aliquam in, fermentum vitae, est. Aenean elit arcu, rhoncus ac, convallis vel, dictum ac, risus. Fusce eget nunc id ante feugiat condimentum.. Proin felis erat, tristique id, ornare vitae, auctor quis, purus. Sed pede justo, mattis nec, aliquet in, accumsan in, ante. Quisque lectus tortor, lobortis a, aliquam id, vehicula id, nunc.. Mauris sem tellus, ullamcorper convallis, cursus vel, iaculis at, ipsum.

Conclusion: Aliquam lectus arcu, iaculis a, bibendum at, dapibus elementum, nisl. Suspendisse quam nulla, fermentum eu, sagittis a, pulvinar id, lacus. Aliquam neque lectus, luctus sed, tristique a, laoreet sagittis, libero. Duis dolor augue, adipiscing vel, volutpat vel, dapibus consectetuer, orci. Duis est tellus, volutpat in, gravida adipiscing, elementum nec, tortor. Praesent nec est eget mauris vehicula fermentum. Nunc ut nisl tincidunt risus lobortis pellentesque. Fusce mi pede, laoreet in, facilisis at, suscipit sed, magna.

Keywords: Nulla in dolor, In molestie, Donec tortor, Nulla facilisi, Ut est

Received: October 10, 2007; Accepted: November 2, 2007; Published: December 1, 2007 

Open full article

References

  1. Clarke D, Sudhakaran N, Gateley CA. Replace fi ne needle aspiration cytology with automated core biopsy in the triple assessment of breast cancer. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2001; 83:1102.
  2. Schoonjans JM, Brem RF. Fourteen-gauge ultrasonographically guided large-core needle biopsy of breast masses. J Ultrasound Med 2001; 20:96772
  3. Morris KT, Vetto JT, Petty JK, Lum SS, Schmidt WA, Toth-Fejel S, et al. A new score for the evaluation of palpable breast masses in women under age 40. Am J Surg 2002; 184:3467. Go to original source...
  4. Wendie A. Berg, MD, PhD, Lorena Gutierrez, MD, Moriel S. NessAiver, PhD, W. Bradford Carter, MD2, Mythreyi Bhargavan, PhD, Rebecca S. Lewis, MPH and Olga B. Ioff e, MD Diagnostic Accuracy of mammography, Clinical Examination, US, and MR Imaging in Preoperative Assessment of Breast Cancer1 radiology. rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/abstract/233/3/830
  5. Kerlikowske K, Smith-Bindman R, Ljung BM, Grady D. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Aug 19; 139(4): 27484. Evaluation of abnormal mammography results and palpable breast abnormalities. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Aug 19; 139(4): 27484. Go to original source...
  6. Kopans DB. Breast imaging. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1998:29 54
  7. Chakraborti KL, Bahl P, Sahoo M, Ganguly SK, Oberoi C. Magentic resonance imaging of breast masses: Comparison with mammography. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2005; 15:381387 Go to original source...
  8. Pande AR, Lohani B, Sayami P, Pradhan S.Predictive value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of palpable breast lump. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2003 Apr-Jun; 1(2): 7884.
  9. Fajardo LL. Screening mammography, sonography of dense fi - brocystic breast tissue. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Dec; 181(6): 1715. Go to original source...
  10. Dennis MA, Parker SH, Klaus AJ, Stavros AT, Kaske TI, Clark SB. Breast biopsy avoidance: the value of normal mammograms and normal sonograms in the setting of a palpable lump. Radiology 2001; 219:186 -191 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Weinstein SP, Conant EF, Orel SG, Zuckerman JA, Czerniecki B, Lawton TJ. Retrospective review of palpable breast lesions after negative mammography and sonography. J Women's Imaging 2000; 2:1518
  12. Kerlikowske K, Smith-Bindman R, Ljung BM, Grady D. Evaluation of abnormal mammography results and palpable breast abnormalities. Ann Intern Med 2003; 139:27484. Go to original source...
  13. Shetty MK, Shah YP, Sharman RS. Prospective evaluation of the value of combined mammographic and sonographic assessment in patients with palpable abnormalities of the breast. J Ultrasound Med 2003; 22:2638. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Kumle M, Weiderpass E, Braaten T, Persson I, Adami HO, Lund E. Use of oral contraceptives and breast cancer risk: the Norwegian- Swedish Women's Lifestyle and Health Cohort Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002; 11:137581.
  15. Budai B, Szamel I, Sulyok Z, Nemet M, Bak M, Otto S, et al. Characteristics of cystic breast disease with special regard to breast cancer development. Anticancer Res 2001; 21:74952.
  16. Barton MB, Harris R, Fletcher SW. The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have breast cancer? The screening clinical breast examination: should it be done? How? JAMA 1999; 282:127080. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Osuch JR, Reeves MJ, Pathak DR, Kinchelow T. BREASTAID: clinical results from early development of a clinical decision rule for palpable solid breast masses. Ann Surg 2003; 238:72837. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Moss HA, Britton PD, Flower CD, Freeman AH, Lomas DJ; Warren RM. How reliable is modern breast imaging in diff erentiating benign from malignant breast lesions in the symptomatic population? Clin Radiol 1999; 54:67682. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Berg WA, Campassi CI, Ioff e OB. Cystic lesions of the breast: sonographic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 2003; 227:18391. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that infl uence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 2002; 225:16575. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Lister D, Evans AJ, Burrell HC, Blamey RW, Wilson AR, Pinder SE, et al. The accuracy of breast ultrasound in the evaluation of clinically benign discrete, symptomatic breast lumps. Clin Radiol 1998; 53:4902. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Barlow WE, Lehman CD, Zheng Y, Ballard-Barbash R, Yankaskas BC, Cutter GR, et al. Performance of diagnostic mammography for women with signs or symptoms of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002; 94:11519. Go to original source...
  23. Leichter I, Buchbinder S, Bamberger P, Novak B, Fields S, Lederman R. Quantitative characterization of mass lesions on digitized mammograms for computer-assisted diagnosis. Invest Radiol 2000; 35:36672. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Obenauer S, Luftner-Nagel S, von Heyden D, Munzel U, Baum F, Grabbe E. Screen fi lm vs full-fi eld digital mammography: image quality, detectability and characterization of lesions [published correction appears in Eur Radiol 2002; 12:2388]. Eur Radiol 2002; 12:1697702. Go to original source...
  25. Lewin JM, Hendrick RE, D'Orsi CJ, Isaacs PK, Moss LJ, Karellas A, et al. Comparison of full-fi eld digital mammography with screenfi lm mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations. Radiology 2001; 218:87380. Go to original source...
  26. Westenend PJ, Sever AR, Beekman-De Volder HJ, Liem SJ. A comparison of aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy in the evaluation of breast lesions. Cancer 2001; 93:14650. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

Return to the content