Exemplis Discimus 2007, 151(2):333-339

Quisque purus ante, luctus eget, tincidunt et, dapibus sit amet, lacus.

Dais Valentinea, Mia Altairb, Risa Caranthyra, Alen Rourkec, Artemes Dominiaa, Leia Bardakd, Kistan Surtoskeb, Sakura Qui Rakb
a Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kastolar Faculty Hospital, Dantooine Republic
b Faculty of Psychiatry, Teaching Hospital of Tharin, Saleucami Republic
c Institute of Pharmacotherapy, Teaching Hospital of Tion Cluster, Republic of Nar Shaddaa
d National Institute of Pharmaceutics, University of Senex, Yavin Republic

Background: Vivamus accumsan mi non est pulvinar euismod. Curabitur eu odio ut felis pharetra sodales.. Praesent leo justo, egestas in, tempor quis, lobortis vel, tortor. Sed magna felis, viverra in, pharetra at, sodales eu, ante. Morbi libero orci, malesuada nec, sodales vitae, dictum non, felis. Suspendisse vitae est at libero imperdiet mattis. Fusce mi pede, laoreet in, facilisis at, suscipit sed, magna. Suspendisse ligula magna, congue sit amet, facilisis nec, dignissim nec, nunc.

Aim: Nulla consequat, lorem vel vulputate semper, ipsum risus tincidunt elit, varius lobortis orci felis eu metus. Vestibulum tincidunt, quam vel ultrices semper, felis ligula feugiat est, et venenatis est pede nec tellus.

Patients and methods: Suspendisse fringilla sapien et ante tempor scelerisque. Sed dolor est, porttitor ac, tempor ac, sagittis et, arcu. Curabitur et orci eu turpis venenatis mollis. Vivamus et sapien nec metus faucibus luctus. Duis blandit metus sit amet nulla lacinia pharetra. Vestibulum nec lacus sit amet tellus feugiat accumsan. Aenean eros tellus, pharetra sit amet, condimentum a, rhoncus in, odio. Aliquam mauris arcu, porttitor ut, dignissim ut, tristique quis, mi.

Results: Fusce arcu odio, faucibus id, vulputate non, sagittis non, magna. Suspendisse nibh nisl, iaculis non, rutrum fringilla, viverra bibendum, lacus. Quisque in enim lacinia sapien consequat congue. Nunc lectus purus, pellentesque sit amet, tincidunt sollicitudin, pulvinar vitae, nisi. Quisque lectus tortor, lobortis a, aliquam id, vehicula id, nunc.. Quisque purus ante, luctus eget, tincidunt et, dapibus sit amet, lacus. Integer pede felis, varius et, tincidunt eget, vestibulum ut, magna. Duis lorem mi, consectetuer vel, consectetuer nec, suscipit quis, augue.

Conclusions: Proin felis erat, tristique id, ornare vitae, auctor quis, purus. Nullam orci leo, porttitor non, rhoncus nec, congue porttitor, magna. Nulla viverra urna a purus vulputate auctor. Maecenas eget felis id tortor pulvinar molestie. Nulla vitae lectus eu nulla vehicula pellentesque. Nam pede leo, ornare ac, porta quis, dignissim sit amet, erat. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Cras ipsum ante, vulputate vitae, facilisis id, imperdiet vel, felis.

Kľúčové slová: Curabitur vehicula, Integer ultricies, In non leo, Vestibulum a orci, Maecenas et orci

Vložený: September 15, 2007; Přijatý: November 5, 2007; Uverejnené: December 1, 2007 


Referencie

  1. Ditrichova D, Dobesova J, Kapralova S, Eber M, Steigerova H. Nejcastejsi kontaktni alergeny ustni dutiny a rtu. Ces Stomat 2007; 107:3945.
  2. Lygre GB, Gjerdet NR, Gronningsaeter AG, Björkman L. Reporting on adverse reactions to dental materials intraoral observations at a clinical follow-up. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2003; 31:2006. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejsť na PubMed...
  3. Lygre GB, Gjerdet NR, Björkman L. A follow-up study of patiens with subjective symptoms related to dental materials. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2005; 33:22734. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejsť na PubMed...
  4. Torgerson RR, Davis MD, Bruce AJ, Farmer SA, Rogers RS 3rd. Contact allergy in oral disease. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007; 57:315 21. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejsť na PubMed...
  5. Koch P, Bahmer FA. Oral lesions and symptoms related to metals used in dental restorations: a clinical, allergological and histological study. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999; 41:42230. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejsť na PubMed...
  6. Gawkrodger DJ. Investigation of reactions to dental materials. Br J Dermatol 2005; 153:47985. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejsť na PubMed...
  7. Dobesova J, Ditrichova D, Kapralova S, Pirek P, Eber M. Kontaktni alergicka cheilitida. Derma 2007; 7:126.
  8. Laeijendecker R, Dekker SK, Burger PM, Mulder PGH, Van Joost T, Neumann MHA. Oral Lichen Planus and Allergy to Dental Amalgam Restorations. Arch Dermatol 2004; 140:14348. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejsť na PubMed...
  9. Thornhill MH. Oral lichenoid lesions and amalgam fi llings. Evid Based Dent 2006; 7:745. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejsť na PubMed...
  10. Edwards PC, Kelsch R. Oral Lichen Planus: Clinical Presentation and Management. J Can Dent Assoc 2002; 68:4949.
  11. Hoskyn J, Guin JD. Contact allergy to cinnamal in a patient with oral lichen planus. Contact Dermatitis 2005; 52:160. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejsť na PubMed...
  12. Hougeir FG, Yiannias JA, Hinni ML, Hentz JG, el-Azhary RA. Oral metal contact allergy: a pilot study on the cause of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Dermatol 2006; 45:26571. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejsť na PubMed...
  13. Ismail SB, Kumar SKS, Zain RB. Oral lichen planus and lichenoid reactions: etiopathogenesis, diagnosis, management and malignant transformation. J Oral Sci 2007; 49:89106. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejsť na PubMed...
  14. van der Meij EH, Mast H, van der Waal I. The possible premalignant character of oral lichen planus and oral lichenoid lesions: A prospective fi ve-year follow-up study of 192 patients. Oral Oncol 2007; 43:7428. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejsť na PubMed...
  15. Rietschel RL, Fowler JF Jr. Fisher´s contact dermatitis. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001.
  16. Catalogue Patch Test Products. Chemotechnique Diagnostics. Sweden: 2007.
  17. Wong L, Freeman S. Oral lichenoid lesions (OLL) and mercury in amalgam fi llings. Contact Dermatitis 2003; 48:749. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejsť na PubMed...
  18. Yiannias JA, Azhary RA, Hand JH, Pakzad SY, Rogers RS III. Relevant contact sensitivities in patients with the diagnosis of oral lichen planus. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000; 42:17782. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejsť na PubMed...
  19. Athavale PN, Shum KW, Yeoman CM, Gawkrodger DJ. Oral lichenoid lesions and contact allergy to dental mercury and gold. Contact Dermatitis 2003; 49:2645. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejsť na PubMed...
  20. Dunsche A, Kästel I, Terheyden H, Springer ING, Christophers E, Brasch J. Oral lichenoid reactions associated with amalgam: improvement after amalgam removal. Br J Dermatol 2003; 148:70 6. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejsť na PubMed...
  21. Dunsche A, Frank MP, Lüttges J, Acil Y, Brasch J, Christophers E, Springer ING. Lichenoid reactions of murine mucosa associated with amalgam. Br J Dermatol 2003; 148:7418. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejsť na PubMed...
  22. Valentova K. Chemicke vlastnosti dentalnich materialu. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackeho; 2006.
  23. Tvinnereim HM, Lundekvam BF, Morken T, Berge ME, Björkman L. Allergic contact reactions to dental gold. Contact Dermatitis 2003; 48:2889. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejsť na PubMed...
  24. Laine J, Kalimo K, Happonen RP. Contact allergy to dental restorative materials in patients with oral lichenoid lesions. Contact Dermatitis 1997; 36:1416. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejsť na PubMed...
  25. Möller H. Dental gold alloys and contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis 2002; 47:636. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejsť na PubMed...
  26. Auzerie V, Mahé E, Marck Y, Auff ret N, Descamps V, Crickx B. Oral lichenoid eruption due to methacrylate allergy. Contact Dermatitis 2001; 45:241. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejsť na PubMed...
  27. Henriks-Eckerman ML, Suuronen K, Jolanki R, Alanko K. Methacrylates in dental restorative materials. Contact Dermatitis 2004; 50:2337. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejsť na PubMed...
  28. Goon ATJ, Isaksson M, Zimerson E, Goh CL, Bruze M. Contact allergy to (meth)acrylates in the dental series in southern Sweden: simultaneous positive patch test reaction patterns and possible screening allergens. Contact Dermatitis 2006; 55:21926. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejsť na PubMed...
  29. Isaksson M, Lindberg M, Sundberg K, Hallander A, Bruze M. The development and course of patch-test reactions to 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate. Contact Dermatitis 2005; 53:2927. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejsť na PubMed...
  30. Urbanček S, Dastychová E, Buchvald D, Vocilková A. Kontaktné alergény v pracovnom a životnom prostredí. Banská Bystrica: Gutenberg; 2005.
  31. Clayton R, Orton D. Contact allergy to spearmint oil in a patient with oral lichen planus. Contact Dermatitis 2004; 51:3145. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejsť na PubMed...
  32. Fujita Y, Shimizu T, Nishie W, Shimizu H. Contact dermatitis due to eugenol used to treat oral lichen planus. Contact Dermatitis 2003; 48:2856. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejsť na PubMed...
  33. Thorn JJ, Holmstrup P, Rindum J, Pindborg JJ. Course of various clinical forms of oral lichen planus. A prospective follow-up study of 611 patients. J Oral Pathol 1988; 17:2138. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju...
  34. Benakova N, Stork J. Lichen planus a lichenoidni reakce. Ces-slov Derm 2005; 80:6575.
  35. van der Meij EH, Schepman KP, Plonait DR, Axéll T, van der Waal I. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the clinical assessment of oral lichen planus. J Oral Pathol 2002; 31:958. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju...
  36. van der Meij EH, van der Waal I. Lack of clinicopathologic correlation in the diagnosis of oral lichen planus based on the presently available diagnostic criteria and suggestions for modifi cations. J Oral Pathol 2003; 32:50712. Prejsť k pôvodnému zdroju... Prejsť na PubMed...